Con Imperio, Michael Hardt y Antonio Negri se convirtieron en los teóricos visionarios del nuevo orden global. Ahora, en Multitud, ofrecen una esperanzadora. Este trabajo comprende dos grandes bloques. En el primero (§1 y §2), analizamos en perspectiva histórica la extraordinaria aceleración de la temporalidad. Download Citation on ResearchGate | Multitud: guerra y democracia en la era del Imperio / M. Hardt, A. Negri ; tr. por Juan Antonio Bravo. | Traducción de.
|Published (Last):||13 June 2005|
|PDF File Size:||13.13 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||1.65 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Cultural depictions Spinoza book by Stuart Hampshire Spinoza: The third and final part of the trilogy, Commonwealth, appeared in the Fall of War and Democracy in the Age of Empire Spinoza’s philosophical system Spinozism Spinozist rationalism Spinozist metaphysics Spinozist epistemology three kinds of knowledge Spinozistic ethics Spinozistic attributes Spinozistic theory of the emotions Spinozistic conception of freedom Spinozistic conception of power potentia cogitandipotentia agendi Natura naturans Natura naturata Affect Immanence Conatus Multitude Scientia intuitiva Intuitive knowledge Sub specie aeternitatis Causa sui Cause of itself Deus sive Natura God or Nature Amor Dei intellectualis Intellectual love of God Libertas philosophandi Freedom to philosophize Substance theory Mind—body problem Biblical criticism Historical criticism.
In their sequel Multitude: For Hobbes the multitude was a rabble that needed to enact a social contract with a monarch, thus turning them from a multitude into a people. The multitude is a concept of a population that has not entered into a social contract with a sovereign political body, such that individuals retain the capacity for political self-determination.
Multitude – Wikipedia
This book is not yet featured on Listopia. In his more recent writings with Michael Hardthowever, he does not so much offer a direct definition, but presents the concept through a series of mediations. Just a moment while we sign you in to your Goodreads account.
To ask other readers questions about La multitud y la guerraplease sign up. Refresh and try again. Look up multitude in Wiktionary, the free dictionary. It remains a rather vague concept which is assigned a revolutionary potential without much theoretical substantiation apart from a generic potential of love.
They also express, nourish, and develop positively their own constituent projects. It must next be observed, that in laying foundations it is very necessary to study the human passions: This is when the political is really affirmed—when the genesis is complete and self-valorization, the muktitud convergence of subjects, and the proletarian management of production become a constituent power. In Empire it is mediated by the concept of Empire the new global constitution that Negri and Hardt describe as a copy of Polybius ‘s description of Roman government:.
Multitud/ Multitude : Michael Hardt :
The multitude is used as a term and implied as a concept throughout Spinoza’s work. Preview — La multitud y la guerra by Michael Hardt.
Views Read Edit View history. La multitud y la guerra by Michael Hardt.
Cinta marked it as to-read May 31, Certainly, there must be a moment when reappropriation [of wealth from capital] and selforganization [of the multitude] reach a threshold and configure a real event. Lists with This Book.
New figures of struggle and new subjectivities are produced multittud the conjecture of events, in the universal nomadism […] They are not posed merely against the imperial system—they are not simply negative forces.
La multitud y la guerra
For if the constitution of the dominion, or the public liberty depends only on the weak assistance of the laws, not only will the citizens have no security for its maintenance […], but it will even turn to their ruin.
Multitude is a term for a group of people who cannot be classed under any other distinct category, except for their shared fact of multitkd.
It has been praised as the “Communist Manifesto of the 21st Century. There are no discussion topics on this book yet. But if I succeed in showing that the foundation of monarchical dominion […], are firm and cannot be plucked up, without the indignation of the larger part of an armed multitude, and that from them follow peace and security for king and multitude, and if I deduce this from general human nature, no one will be able to doubt, that these foundations are the best and the true ones.
The term has a history of use reaching back to antiquity, but took on a strictly political concept when it was first used by Machiavelli and reiterated by Spinoza. Paperbackpages.