: Eleganter Unsinn. () by Alan Sokal; Jean Bricmont and a great selection of similar New, Used and Collectible Books available. Results 1 – 14 of 14 Discover Book Depository’s huge selection of Alan-Sokal books online. Free delivery worldwide Eleganter Unsinn · Alan Sokal. Paperback. A review and a link to other reviews of Fashionable Nonsense by Alan Sokal and Authors: Alan Sokal and Jean Bricmont Eleganter Unsinn – Deutschland.

Author: Kinris Faugore
Country: Myanmar
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Sex
Published (Last): 18 January 2007
Pages: 351
PDF File Size: 14.93 Mb
ePub File Size: 17.1 Mb
ISBN: 804-5-65211-256-7
Downloads: 72048
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Gardabei

Das Risiko und sein Preis — Skin in the Game. Naturally there are also some who argue that thinkers in the humanities should not be as earthbound and as hidebound as scientists and should have the liberty of stretching truth and reality if it suits their purposes, i.

Learn more about Amazon Prime. The shoddily edited Social Text — its editors perhaps so pleased to find themselves extensively cited that they did not actually read the submission very carefully — betrayed all sense of academic rigor and standards Astonishingly no one seems to have lost their jobs or positions as a result of this case — academia, ain’t it great!

Fashionable Nonsense – Canada. Share your thoughts with other customers. We don’t really get that argument, but it is a fun idea.

Alan Sokal

Trying to meet all your book preview and review needs. Radical thought must be embraced — but what the Social Text folk do is neither radical nor is it sokxl. The notorious parody written by Alan Sokal and published by a gullible gang of academics at Usinn Text is one of the sadder chapters in modern American academia. Latour – just like Lacan see A. Enter your mobile number or email address below and we’ll send you a link to download the free Kindle App.

If you are a seller for this product, would you like to suggest updates through seller support? Unxinn leafing through, but hard to recommend actually reading it. Proper reasoning is no longer called for — when in fact it is the first thing that should be called for. Amazon Business Service for business customers. Product details Paperback Publisher: Wanting to be open-minded we would like to consider the possibility that all these writers only mean all these stupid things they are saying as metaphorbut my oh my what a slippery slope that puts us on.


Whereof one cannot speak, a soka, wise man once suggested, thereof one should remain silent.

For those who do not recall it: Sokal submitted a paper titled Transgressing the Boundaries: Dtv 1 May Soakl Certainly all ways of alam at something should be considered, but equally certainly most like sexed relativity can be quickly dismissed. Ein Essay zur politischen Dramaturgie. The selections are numbingly horrific, an outrage so maddening that we actually found it physically difficult to read the book. And it doesn’t seem to fly, because these grand thinkers are all so damn ponderous and serious.

Impostures intellectuelles – France. Amazon Music Stream millions of songs. More plausible is the argument that Sokal and Bricmont only show a few selective examples, that these may or may not be representative, and that they often only figure in a small part of the cited authors’ works i. The rest, built on the pyramid of empty jargon of literary theory, sociology, psychology, etc.

In our opinion, however, the authors we are investigating are analogies between generally accepted theories from the natural sciences and theories that are too vague to be empirically verifiable e.

Long live logic, indeed. Credit offered by NewDay Ltd, over 18s only, subject to status. It does not mean stating unequivocally, especially if the statements are so inane and absurd that they must or at least should be dismissed as simply meaningless. The passages Sokal and Bricmont present are indeed examples of bad science to put it mildly.

Elegnter seems fairly clear that the thinkers quoted use scientific terminology not for actual support though we are thinking that topology is a fun thing to apply to psychologybut because the abstract notion “science” lends their arguments credibility.

Niemann’s SOKAL page

Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. Fashionable Nonsense – US. Please note that these ratings solely represent the complete review ‘s biased interpretation and subjective opinion of the actual reviews and do not claim to accurately reflect or represent the views of the reviewers. Comment by the sender of the contribution. Impostures intellectuelles – Canada. Das Gespenst des Populismus: Delivery and Returns see our delivery rates and policies thinking of returning an item?


Much of the debate is about relativism — the absolute truth of science versus modern theory’s insistence on relativism. Sokal and Bricmont go to great lengths to maintain that they are only attacking the weak science of these works, but the inescapable conclusion is that thinkers who are willing to spew such claptrap without a thought for its meaning, and whose only goal is to cow and intimidate their audience through the use of incontestable terminology and concepts are, in fact, charlatans, and that while there might be some value in their charlatanry it is not really something we should look upon kindly.

See all free Kindle reading apps.

Towards a Transformative Hermeneutics of Quantum Gravity which he describes as “a parody article crammed with nonsensical, but unfortunately authentic, quotations about physics and mathematics by prominent French and American intellectuals. It is a bizarre debate that has evolved around this, and in fact the critical response is almost as interesting as the book itself. Page 1 of 1 Start over Page 1 of 1. Except for on a funky Star Trek episode we can’t see much use for considering the speed of light privileged.

If nothing else though Sokal and Bricmont show that clarity is necessary, desirable, and really not all that hard to achieve — would that modern culture theory at least pick up that much. This analogy could perhaps contribute to explain relativity theory to a sociologist who is familiar with Latour’s sociology, or to explain Latour’s sociology to a physicist, but what sense should it have in explaining the sociology of Latour to other sociologists on the basis of the analogy to relativity theory?

Customers who bought this item also bought.